The Justice Wants the Games to Stop

Judges and lawyers who are currently addressing workers compensation criminal cases, about thirty of them, were sternly warned by the US Chief Justice. According to the chief justice, the lawyers are no longer allowed to play with the rights of the people during their court cases. Through this very unusual format, the judge asked that the lawyers and judges stop delaying justice.

He didn't place blame on one single person. After the attorney general complained about several judges impeding the state's ability to investigate and then prosecute workers? compensation, the judge made his decree. Several lawyers commented on the attorney general's statements, which were made out of court.

The chief justice said the conference was designed to make sure justice was carried about speedily, and without error. The justice continued by saying that he wanted to see the lawyers and judges present to give as much preference as possible to workers compensation cases, and he wanted them to move them up the court's calendar even if that meant calling special juries to hear the case on time.

Usually orders must be signed by three of the five supreme court justices. This one was only signed by one, and one lawyer questioned its validity because of this. The order had a gag rule, too. And, only one justice signed it. Any type of out-of-court statement made in order to alter public opinion mocks justice.

That type of offensive personality, in his eyes, was clearly in violation of their oaths of office, and he urged them to refrain. The lawyers were reminded that issues with other lawyers needed to be dealt with in the proper arena. That means lawyers could bring up problems with other lawyers in the court itself, with grievance committees or in the legal practice commission. The justice reminded the judges that due process must be given to the trial participants and that due process must be given. Although questions were allowed from the floor, it was more than evident that complaints and comments about past issues would not be heard. Those were to be left to the proper authorities.

One lawyer, whose client had been indicted by a grand jury, wanted to speak regarding the contrast between media reports and public commenting by the prosecution. The lawyer said our first amendment to the constitution gave the media the right to report, but the Canons of Ethics made public comments by the prosecution inexcusable. One lawyer claimed to have taken legal steps to protect his client, not having violated the gag rule.

An indicted lawyer's counsel said he wouldn't give any of his client's rights away; he was just being mean. One lawyer talked briefly about his concern that by not speaking, the public may think his client is admitting to some guilt. An imprisoned lawyer's attorney, said the publicity workers compensation criminal cases had was growing on a terrible course. Yet another counselor reported his client is facing terrible effects from the negative publicity in his case.

Article Source: http://www.seoserviceprovider.com/articles

When you would like to get more information on compensation solicitors melbourne check out this site. For resources on compensation solicitors brighton check out this site.

Please Rate this Article

5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5 

Not yet Rated